Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8399 13
Original file (NR8399 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ~~~
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TUR
‘Docket No: 8399-13
27 January 2015

 

isted of your application, together with all
Material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies,

2 June 1992, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four
occasions for two Specifications of assault, sleeping on post,
absence from your appointed place of duty, disobedience,
disrespect, disorderly conduct, and a five day period of
NUPS. Further, you were given an.opportunity to defend your
‘actions, but waived: your procedural rights. Accordingly, your
‘2pplication has:been denied.

it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider: its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Roard
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. In this

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11597 14

    Original file (NR11597 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2573 14

    Original file (NR2573 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 18 March 2015. Accordingly, your application has been denied, It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5468 14

    Original file (NR5468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11993 14

    Original file (NR11993 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. The BOI found by a vote of three to zero, that you had committed misconduct, and although -the reason was supported by evidence, found that there was not sufficient evidence to recommend your separation from the Navy. The .Board found that the CO’s decision to.impose NJP was based on facts and circumstances surrounding the incident, and that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02476-98

    Original file (02476-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Veterans Affairs (DVA) indicates that there is nothing concerning treatment for wounds in your medical record. decision you submitted states as follows concerning your claim of being wounded in action: There is nothing in your service record to show that you A rating decision from the Department of The DVA rating The veteran was part of the Mobile Construction Battalion Three, which arrived in Vietnam in April of He worked at a rock crusher sight (sic) located 1967. in the bush somewhat...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02031-01

    Original file (02031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    effect, disenrolled yourself from the program by refusing to enroll in required Naval Science classes, and then attempted to procure a favorable separation for medical reasons. discharge for medical reasons. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13302 14

    Original file (NR13302 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that your commanding officer's decision to impose NJP was appropriate, and it was administratively and procedurally correct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5054 14

    Original file (NR5054 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR671 14

    Original file (NR671 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks assigned on a periodic basis.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05450-05

    Original file (05450-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. You were discharged from the Naval Reserve on 28 June 2005, without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy.As the Board was not persuaded that you suffered from strep throat during the 14-28 March 2002 period, and that your disability was incurred while you were performing duty in the Naval Reserve, it was...